“Beyond the Food Drive”

“This year, an average of 1.5 million New York City residents, 1 in 4 of which are children, live in households facing food insecurity.”

The above was one of the many facts addressed at a conference hosted by the New York City Coalition Against Hunger. The conference, which was held Saturday at Barnard College, focused on ending hunger through citizen action.

I was particularly struck by the title of the workbook handed out to the participants: “Beyond the Food Drive.” As I learned at the conference, canned food drives are actually one of the most ineffective and inefficient ways to fight hunger. According to the NYCCAH, the top three ways for volunteers to combat this epidemic are to contact elected officials, help connect eligible families to SNAP/Food Stamp benefits, and help increase participation in school breakfast programs. While food drives can be helpful, ultimately it is the public policy that needs to change.

Later in the day I attended a panel discussion on legislative and policy advocacy. One word kept jumping out at me: stigma. Hunger and food insecurity remain invisible scourges largely because of the stigma of public assistance. According to NYCCAH:

Out of families with children suffering from food insecurity and hunger, 68 percent contained at least one adult working full-time, 10 percent had at least one adult working part-time, seven percent had an unemployed adult actively looking for work, and eight percent were headed by an adult with a disability. The main problem is low wages and few jobs, not laziness.

We need to bring this crisis out of the shadows; we need to make it clear that there is no shame in needing help. Most importantly, we need make sure that our elected officials, the people who make public policy, know what hunger and food insecurity really looks like.

So how can you help?

1. Demand that the next mayor commit to mandating that schools in NYC participate in the National School Breakfast program. According to NYCCAH, “[b]ecause School Breakfast is reimbursed by the federal government, serving breakfast to low-income students not only reduces tardiness and helps them perform better in school, but also brings federal dollars directly into the school district.” So the next time you attend a mayoral forum, or receive a phone call from a candidate asking for a donation, ask them if they plan to mandate school breakfasts and how else they plan to address child hunger in the city.

2. Start or Join a Food Action Board. Action Board members meet at least once every 2 weeks in their neighborhood to (1) train and (2) take action. Members work to get letters signed, make phone calls, talk to the media, engage and educate their peers, give public testimony, and meet with their elected officials. For more information on how to join your local board, or start your own, click HERE.

3. Volunteer your skills. “Although NYCCAH values all types of volunteerism, the Coalition is looking to redefine volunteerism and how people serve. The truth is that relatively few pantries and kitchens need more untrained volunteers to perform manual food service tasks. What these agencies really need are dedicated long-term volunteers or professional and technical volunteers (e.g. experts in web design, grant writing, or accounting).” NYCCHA has a volunteer matching system on their website which can help connect you to an organization that could use your help: http://www.nyccah.org/hunger-volunteer.html

The fight against hunger is one we can win, if we are committed and hold our elected officials accountable. The New York City Coalition Against Hunger is doing amazing work, but they can’t do it alone. To learn more, check out the official NYCCAH handbook and volunteer to help end hunger in New York City by 2018.

Bookmark and Share
Tagged , | Comments:

City Year’s annual benefit – tomorrow night!


Tomorrow, City Year is hosting their annual young professionals benefit at Studio Arte with a goal to raise $100,000 to enable an entire team of City Year Corps Members to serve in an under-served school.

The event will include open bar and Hors d ’Oeuvres, a silent auction, and a raffle with the grand prize of TWO tickets to the 2014 Super Bowl XLVIII, an historic event as it is the first outdoor “cold-weather city” Super Bowl and will be played at MetLife Stadium!!!

At a glance:

· Wednesday, April 24th, 2013
· Location: Studio Arte
· Three-hour open bar, Hors d ’Oeuvres, Raffle and Silent Auction
· Time: 7:00-10:00
· Tickets: $100 in advance and $125 at the door

Click here to purchase your tickets.

Also, if you cannot be there you can purchase the raffle tickets separately. Please note: The first page of the donation page needs to be filled out and the ‘continue’ button hit to see raffle-specific information. Lastly, if you cannot be there and want to show your support, you can make a donation to support their work.

Bookmark and Share
Comments:

Math Curricula and the New York Knicks

After a number of education-related jobs including subbing, teaching religious school, and working at overnight camps, Jesse Schneiderman is a high school social studies teacher at a charter school in the South Bronx. Jesse believes that, while we’d love to eliminate a good deal of testing, that it’s important to work to live with it rather than against it.

Teams across sports make the same mistake over and over again: they change coaches or management too quickly to see strategies put in place actually play out. My New York Knicks are a prime example. From 2001-2012, the Knicks had eight coaches and, until recently, were the subject of much mockery throughout the NBA. The San Antonio Spurs (a model NBA franchise), on the contrary, have had one.

New York’s math curriculum from 2002-2008 was more Knicks than Spurs. During this time, New York went from the “sequential” system, to the “Math AB” sequence, to a subject-based system. If a student entered high school in 2002, he or she took Sequential I (and was expected to take three math Regents exams through his or her high school career). A student entering high school in 2003, however, would start in Math A (and take two math Regents by his or her senior year).  From 2008 on, students have taken subject based math courses. That’s three math tracks in six years.

Imagine being a math teacher in 2004. How could you best help your students when asked to prepare sophomores for a Regents in January, start a new course for those same sophomores immediately following the exam, while teaching juniors Trigonometry and advanced Algebra (and preparing them for an entirely different state test, of course)? A little stability would have gone a long way.

With the recent news of Common Core testing in schools and the anxiety it has caused students, a fervor to back off on testing our kids has been renewed. My big concern with testing, however, is that it will resemble my New York Knicks and our old math curriculum. If the Common Core were implemented, it would take thirteen years to test one full cycle of students (kindergarten through twelfth grade). To get a large enough sample, however, it should get at least three full cycles (fifteen years).  That begs the question – will we be patient enough with our new system? Once poor test scores reign in years three, four, and five of the Common Core, will testing companies start looking elsewhere for their pay day? Hopefully, whatever system is implemented is given a true chance to be evaluated. In other words, let’s be the Spurs, not the Knicks.

Bookmark and Share
Comments:

Open Seat 2013 is Here!

Once again, Manhattan Young Democrats’ biannual Open Seat Project is under way. In case you don’t know what that means, we are recruiting and training young, progressive Democrats (i.e. you) to run for New York County Committee. The Democratic Party in Manhattan is made up of over 2,000 of these County Committee positions, yet four years ago, it was discovered that about 900 were vacant – thus the Open Seat Project was created as a means to simultaneously address this structural deficit and channel the energy of progressive New Yorkers seeking to be more active in their political party.

In 2009, MYD’s first Open Seat Project successfully trained and elected 60 new members to County Committee. Two years later, that number rose to 90, and we are aiming to recruit well past 100 County Committee members this year. If you are interested in learning more about Open Seat or how to become a candidate, email John Bartos at political@gomyd.com, and you can sign up for Open Seat directly by filling out the form below.  If you don’t know what Assembly District or Election District you reside in, you can find out by going to the NYC Board of Election’s Poll Site Locator, but not to worry if you have trouble – we can fill out that information for you.

Can’t see the form? Click here.

Bookmark and Share
Tagged , , | Comments:

Follow the Money, 2013: Big Money Wins

Follow the Money is a feature by Jon Reznick, recurring every few weeks, that takes a closer look at campaign finance using public data. The views presented herein are solely those of the author, and it’s about to get real in here.

People wrongly assume that my interest in campaign finance and in encouraging dramatic reform of the campaign finance system makes me a natural ally of the Fair Elections for New York campaign. This is not the case. Let me start out by saying flat out and without reservation that I do not think encouraging small donors is actually any better than encouraging big ones. My view, which I am testing with exploratory statistics, is that encouraging donor-ship at all, and tolerating any fundraising component in campaigning whatsoever inevitably and unavoidably benefits Big, Institutional, and Early money (what I will refer to as I cover this topic over the months as Smart Money). Over the course of this year, I seek to prove this to be axiomatic, no matter how much you juke the incentives. Fair Elex takes the counterpoint to this here: http://www.fairelectionsny.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/3ThingsFairElexFlyer-N.pdf

How’s it looking for small donors?

I make three fundamental claims. One is about Big Money, another is about Early Money (which I hear, it’s like yeast?) and the last is about Institutional Money including but not limited to PACs, Labor organizations (who spend through PACs), Party organizations, and neighborhood political clubs. These three Smart Money concepts all connect in the sense that once your political campaigns are organized around the concept of fund-raising as an essential component, you literally cannot keep Big Money, Early Money, and Institutional Money from winning. But let’s begin to test the Fair Elex assumptions, I might be wrong! Today, we’re going to address Big Money. (more…)

Bookmark and Share
Tagged | Comments: